Top RabbitMQ Monitoring Tools in 2025: Metrics, Integrations, and Best Fit for Message-Driven

RabbitMQ is a leading open-source message broker with 35,000+ GitHub stars, used from startups to Fortune 500s. In production, teams must go beyond the basic Management UI to track queue depth, consumer lag, and cluster health. With data volumes growing and SaaS costs rising, efficient, correlated monitoring across metrics, traces, and logs has become essential in 2025.

CubeAPM positions itself as a modern RabbitMQ monitoring tool. CubeAPM makes RabbitMQ monitoring easier by ingesting metrics directly from the Management API, mapping them to traces and logs, and offering ready-made dashboards and alerts to catch backlogs or consumer drops before they escalate.

In this guide, we’ll break down the top RabbitMQ monitoring tools available today—starting with CubeAPM and then covering other platforms like Datadog. We’ll compare their RabbitMQ-specific features, pricing, and trade-offs so you can choose the right fit for your workloads.

Best RabbitMQ Monitoring Tools

1. CubeAPM
2. Grafana Cloud
3. Datadog
4. Elastic Observability
5. SigNoz
6. New Relic
7. Better Stack
8. Dynatrace

What is RabbitMQ Monitoring

RabbitMQ monitoring is the process of tracking the health and performance of a RabbitMQ cluster. It focuses on metrics such as queue depth, message publish and delivery rates, consumer activity, connection churn, and node resource usage. These indicators show whether messages are flowing smoothly or if bottlenecks—like backlogged queues or stalled consumers—are forming.

At its core, RabbitMQ monitoring goes beyond checking node uptime: it ensures reliable message delivery, prevents cascading delays in distributed systems, and provides the visibility needed to keep applications responsive. Modern observability platforms extend this by correlating RabbitMQ metrics with application traces and logs, making it easier to trace issues from the broker to the services that depend on it.

Common Failure Scenarios RabbitMQ Monitoring Helps Detect

• Queue Backlogs – When publishers outpace consumers, queues fill up, increasing latency and risking dropped or expired messages.
• Consumer Crashes or Stalls – A consumer process going offline or hanging can cause message delivery delays, even if the broker itself is healthy.
• Connection and Channel Leaks – Excessive open connections or channels can exhaust broker resources, leading to rejected clients and unstable clusters.

Example: How CubeAPM Handles RabbitMQ Monitoring

CubeAPM integrates directly with the RabbitMQ Management API and Prometheus plugin through the OpenTelemetry Collector. This setup provides continuous metrics such as queue depth, ack rates, consumer counts, and node health.

Unlike the default RabbitMQ UI, CubeAPM correlates these broker metrics with traces and logs from producer and consumer applications. This makes it clear whether slow consumers, overloaded queues, or faulty publishers are driving delays. For cloud-hosted setups like Amazon MQ for RabbitMQ, CubeAPM supports direct ingestion without relying on costly CloudWatch streams.

Teams can also use prebuilt dashboards and alerting rules, for example:

• Triggering alerts if consumers drop to zero
• Detecting sustained queue backlogs
• Flagging when message rates exceed delivery capacity

This end-to-end visibility helps prevent cascading failures and keeps RabbitMQ clusters stable in production.

Why Teams Choose Different RabbitMQ Monitoring Tools

1. Depth of RabbitMQ Surface Coverage

Tools differ in how fully they capture data from RabbitMQ’s Management API and Prometheus plugin. The strongest solutions expose per-queue, per-vhost, and per-consumer metrics, along with details like unroutable messages, expired messages, and node health.

2. Export Path & Metric Fidelity

Some platforms scrape the rabbitmq_prometheus endpoint on each node and then build cluster-wide views, while others poll the HTTP API directly. The method impacts how granular the data is and whether you get per-node versus aggregated insights.

3. Quorum-Queue & Topology Awareness

Modern RabbitMQ deployments increasingly use quorum queues with Raft-based replication. Monitoring that understands leader/follower roles, replica counts, and failover behavior helps explain backlogs during elections or node failures.

4. Failure-Mode Diagnostics

Strong tools make it easy to detect queue backlogs, consumer stalls, or connection/channel exhaustion, then trace their impact on dependent services. Native RabbitMQ surfaces expose these signals, but not all monitoring platforms highlight them clearly.

5. Trace/Log Correlation for Root Cause

Correlating RabbitMQ metrics with application traces and logs shortens resolution times. This makes it easier to identify if a queue backlog is caused by slow consumers, publisher spikes, or downstream bottlenecks.

6. Managed RabbitMQ Nuances

For managed offerings like Amazon MQ for RabbitMQ, monitoring tools must adapt to provider-specific limits, exposed metrics, and feature sets—such as partial Management API support or version differences around quorum queues.

7. Alert Philosophy & SLOs

Teams take different approaches to RabbitMQ alerting—some prefer rate-based alerts (publish much higher than deliver), others focus on thresholds (queue depth or consumer counts), and some emphasize resource usage (file descriptors or channels). Tools that provide built-in RabbitMQ alert templates reduce guesswork and improve reliability.

Top 10 RabbitMQ Monitoring Tools

1. CubeAPM

Known for

CubeAPM is known for its deep OpenTelemetry-native integrations and purpose-built support for messaging systems like RabbitMQ. It goes beyond generic observability by offering direct ingestion of RabbitMQ metrics, correlation with application traces, and ready-to-use dashboards that help teams catch queue backlogs or consumer issues before they impact critical workloads.

RabbitMQ Monitoring Features

• Direct integration with the RabbitMQ Management API and Prometheus plugin
• Prebuilt dashboards for queue depth, publish/deliver/ack rates, consumer counts, and connection health
• Correlation of RabbitMQ metrics with application traces and logs to pinpoint root causes
• Support for Amazon MQ for RabbitMQ without relying on costly CloudWatch metrics
• Alert templates for backlogs, consumer crashes, and connection/channel exhaustion

Key Features

• Unified metrics, logs, and traces in one backend
• OpenTelemetry Collector support with 800+ integrations
• Compliance-ready for enterprise standards (GDPR, HIPAA, DPDP)

Pros

• RabbitMQ-specific dashboards and alerts
• Transparent pricing per GB ingested
• Works equally well with self-managed RabbitMQ or Amazon MQ

Cons

• Not suited for teams looking for off-prem solutions
• Strictly an observability platform and does not support cloud security management

Pricing

CubeAPM charges a flat $0.15/GB for all telemetry ingestion (metrics, logs, traces combined).

CubeAPM RabbitMQ Monitoring Pricing at Scale

For a mid-size team ingesting 10 TB/month  of RabbitMQ metrics, logs, and traces, CubeAPM would cost about $1,536/month. By comparison, the same 10 TB could exceed $4,000 with New Relic, $5,000 with Grafana Cloud, or $2,000+ with Dynatrace just for logs or traces alone.

Tech Fit

CubeAPM is ideal for organizations that run high-volume RabbitMQ clusters and want monitoring that is both RabbitMQ-aware and application-aware. It is particularly well-suited for teams that need real-time visibility into queue behavior, fast root-cause analysis across services, and predictable costs at scale without worrying about hidden fees or complex billing models.

2. Grafana Cloud

Known for

Grafana Cloud is known for its LGTM stack (Loki for logs, Grafana for visualization, Tempo for traces, Mimir for metrics) and strong alignment with the open-source monitoring ecosystem. It provides flexible dashboards and alerting with deep Prometheus and OpenTelemetry support, making it popular with teams that already rely on open-source observability.

RabbitMQ Monitoring Features

• Prometheus scraping via the RabbitMQ Prometheus plugin (rabbitmq_prometheus)
• Prebuilt Grafana dashboards for queue depth, publish/deliver rates, consumer counts, and node health
• Ability to combine RabbitMQ metrics with other signals (logs, traces, infra metrics) in one unified view
• Alerting through Grafana Alertmanager with support for RabbitMQ backlog and consumer drop thresholds

Key Features

• Native support for logs (Loki), traces (Tempo), and metrics (Mimir)
• Rich dashboarding and visualization capabilities
• Cloud-managed Prometheus with long-term storage
• Strong OpenTelemetry support for unified observability pipelines

Pros

• Strong open-source ecosystem alignment
• Flexible, customizable dashboards
• Good fit for teams already using Prometheus exporters

Cons

• Steeper learning curve for teams unfamiliar with Prometheus/Grafana stack
• Per-GB pricing for logs and traces can grow quickly
• Requires configuration work to set up alerts and dashboards optimally

Pricing

• Logs ingested: $0.50/GB
• Traces ingested: $0.50/GB
• Application observability (APM): $0.04/host-hour (Pro tier)
• Kubernetes monitoring: $0.015/host-hour + $0.001/container-hour

Grafana Cloud RabbitMQ Monitoring Pricing at Scale

For a team ingesting 10 TB/month of RabbitMQ logs and traces, Grafana Cloud would cost about $5,120/month (10,240 GB × $0.50/GB). This figure excludes host-based fees for APM or Kubernetes monitoring, which can add up for larger deployments.

Tech Fit

Grafana Cloud is best for engineering teams already invested in Prometheus and Grafana who want to offload infrastructure management while keeping the flexibility of open-source tools. It’s especially suited to organizations that need powerful visualization and alerting for RabbitMQ metrics in combination with logs and traces.

3. Datadog

Known for

Datadog is a full-stack observability platform widely adopted for its broad integration ecosystem (900+ services), polished dashboards, and ability to unify infrastructure, APM, logs, and security monitoring in one SaaS product. It’s often chosen by teams looking for fast onboarding and deep coverage across multiple technologies.

RabbitMQ Monitoring Features

• Native RabbitMQ integration that collects metrics from the Management API and Prometheus plugin
• Prebuilt dashboards showing queue depth, publish/deliver rates, consumers, and node health
• Alerting rules for queue backlogs, consumer drops, and unroutable messages
• Correlation with APM traces and logs to connect broker performance with application slowdowns

Key Features

• Infrastructure monitoring, APM, logs, RUM, synthetics, and security monitoring
• 900+ one-click integrations with cloud services and databases
• Advanced anomaly detection and forecasting for message rate patterns

Pros

• Very mature integration ecosystem
• Polished dashboards and alerting content
• Strong support for hybrid and cloud-native environments

Cons

• Pricing can become unpredictable at high log or trace volumes
• Cost governance requires active tuning of data pipelines

Pricing

• APM Enterprise: $40 per host/month
• Log Management (Ingest): $0.10 per GB/month
• Error Tracking: $25 per 50,000 errors/month
• Infrastructure Monitoring: $23 per host/month

Datadog RabbitMQ Monitoring Pricing at Scale

For a mid-sized company ingesting 10TB/month of RabbitMQ telemetry, Datadog’s costs can add up quickly. Log Management alone at $0.10/GB would be about $1,024/month (10,240 GB × $0.10). If the company runs 50 hosts, APM Enterprise at $40/host/month adds $2,000 (50 × $40), while Infrastructure Monitoring at $23/host/month adds another $1,150 (50 × $23). Factoring in Error Tracking, with say 1 million errors per month, this would cost $500 (1,000,000 ÷ 50,000 × $25). In total, such a setup could reach around $4,674/month, not including indexing costs, retention, or additional overages, making Datadog one of the pricier RabbitMQ monitoring options at scale.

Tech Fit

Datadog fits best for teams that want a SaaS-first platform with instant RabbitMQ visibility, extensive integrations, and strong dashboards out-of-the-box. It’s a solid choice for companies with diverse stacks, but less ideal for organizations with strict cost or data control requirements.

4. Elastic Observability

Known for

Elastic Observability is part of the Elastic Stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana), long recognized for its powerful search, scalable dashboards, and flexible retention options. Many organizations adopt it because they already use Elastic for log analytics, and want to extend the same platform into infrastructure, APM, and RabbitMQ monitoring. With its new serverless offering, Elastic positions itself as a cost-optimized observability solution that scales to terabytes of data while providing customizable monitoring for message brokers.

RabbitMQ Monitoring Features

• Native RabbitMQ integration with metrics collected from the Management API and logs via Filebeat/Metricbeat
• Prebuilt Kibana dashboards for queue depth, publish/deliver/ack rates, consumer counts, and node performance
• Alerting templates to detect backlogs, unroutable messages, and consumer crashes
• Ability to combine RabbitMQ data with infrastructure and application telemetry for unified analysis

Key Features

• Unified monitoring of logs, metrics, and traces in one Elastic Cloud or self-managed deployment
• Flexible storage tiers for short-term vs. long-term retention
• Rich Kibana visualizations and ad-hoc search for messaging telemetry
• OpenTelemetry ingestion support

Pros

• Low serverless ingest pricing compared to many SaaS competitors
• Mature dashboards and visualization capabilities
• Broad adoption and strong ecosystem support

Cons

• Costs can be fragmented across ingest, retention, and egress
• APM and tracing setup is heavier than metric/log pipelines

Pricing

• Logs ingest: $0.105/GB
• Traces/APM ingest: $0.150/GB
• Retention: $0.018–$0.020/GB-month
• Egress: 50GB free, then $0.05/GB

Elastic RabbitMQ Monitoring Pricing at Scale

For a mid-sized company ingesting 10TB/month of RabbitMQ telemetry, Elastic Observability serverless costs break down as follows. Ingest at $0.105/GB comes to $1,075 (10,240 GB × $0.105). Adding retention costs of $1,000 for long-term storage, plus egress costs of $500 for compliance exports, the total monthly bill rises to about $2,575 ($1,075 + $1,000 + $500). If traces are heavily used instead of logs at the higher $0.15/GB, ingest alone would be $1,536 (10,240 GB × $0.15), making the total closer to $3,036 ($1,536 + $1,000 + $500).

Tech Fit

Elastic Observability is best for teams already invested in the Elastic Stack who want to extend their existing workflows into RabbitMQ monitoring. It’s also a strong fit for organizations that need deep search, customizable dashboards, and granular control over ingest and retention, making it ideal for large-scale RabbitMQ clusters with diverse telemetry needs.

5. SigNoz

Known for

SigNoz is an open-source, OpenTelemetry-native observability platform built as a community-driven alternative to expensive SaaS tools. It’s recognized for providing developers with distributed tracing, metrics, and logs in one interface without vendor lock-in. Many teams choose it for RabbitMQ monitoring because it offers a ready-to-use RabbitMQ dashboard template powered by OTEL, making setup simple for both startups and mid-sized companies scaling their messaging workloads.

RabbitMQ Monitoring Features

• RabbitMQ dashboard template that surfaces queue depth, publish/deliver/ack rates, and consumer activity
• Powered by the OpenTelemetry RabbitMQ receiver, ensuring compatibility with modern telemetry pipelines
• Real-time alerting for consumer stalls, backlog growth, or node health issues
• Unified correlation of RabbitMQ metrics with application traces and logs

Key Features

• Logs, metrics, and traces in a single backend
• Hosted SaaS or fully self-hosted deployment options
• SOC2 and HIPAA compliance for the hosted platform
• Dashboard packs for popular frameworks and services

Pros

• Transparent, per-GB pricing that’s easy to calculate
• Strong OTEL-native alignment and flexibility to self-host
• Active open-source community driving features

Cons

• Smaller ecosystem compared to older enterprise vendors
• Feature roadmap depends heavily on OSS contributions

Pricing

• Base plan: $49/month (includes credits)
• Logs ingest: $0.30/GB
• Traces ingest: $0.30/GB
• Metrics: $0.10 per million samples

SigNoz RabbitMQ Monitoring Pricing at Scale

For a mid-sized company ingesting 10TB/month of RabbitMQ telemetry, SigNoz Cloud pricing is straightforward but grows quickly at scale. At $0.30/GB for logs or traces, ingest costs about $3,072 (10,240 GB × $0.30). Metrics are billed separately at $0.10 per million samples, but assuming 100 million samples per month, that adds $10 (100 × $0.10). Adding the base platform fee of $49/month, the total RabbitMQ monitoring cost comes to around $3,131/month ($3,072 + $10 + $49).

Tech Fit

SigNoz is a strong fit for developer-focused teams that want affordable RabbitMQ monitoring with full OTEL support. It’s ideal for startups and mid-sized companies that need flexibility to self-host or run on the cloud, value open-source transparency, and want a vendor-agnostic path for scaling RabbitMQ observability.

6. New Relic

Known for

New Relic is known for its usage-based pricing model and a strong focus on developer experience. It provides curated dashboards, quickstarts, and integrations across infrastructure, APM, logs, and synthetics, with RabbitMQ monitoring included as part of its “Instant Observability” library.

RabbitMQ Monitoring Features

• On-host integration that pulls data from the RabbitMQ Management API
• Prebuilt dashboards for queue depth, message publish/deliver/ack counts, consumers, and nodes
• Alert conditions for backlogs, dropped consumers, and unroutable messages
• Ability to correlate RabbitMQ metrics with APM traces and logs for root-cause analysis

 

Key Features

• Unified observability with APM, infra monitoring, logs, browser and mobile RUM, synthetics
• Instant Observability hub and prebuilt dashboards
• Flexible role-based user licensing

Pros

• Easy to get started with the 100 GB free tier
• Wide integration library with curated RabbitMQ quickstarts
• Simple per-GB data pricing model

Cons

• Costs rise steeply with log-heavy or high-traffic workloads
• Limited flexibility in per-host RabbitMQ monitoring (one RabbitMQ server per host integration)

Pricing

• Free tier: 100GB/month of data ingested
• Data ingest: $0.40/GB after the 100 GB free tier
• Core users: $49 per user/month

New Relic RabbitMQ Monitoring Pricing at Scale

For a team ingesting 10 TB/month of RabbitMQ telemetry, New Relic would cost about $4,490/month (10,240 GB × $0.40/GB, minus the 100 GB free) adding core users at $49 per user/month for 10 users(49×10) . This covers logs, metrics, and traces since all signals share the same per-GB model. At scale, organizations often face additional spend on user licenses and advanced retention, pushing total monthly costs even higher.

Tech Fit

New Relic is a strong fit for teams that want a single per-GB billing model and curated dashboards out-of-the-box. It works especially well for developers and product teams who value ease of setup, but it can become expensive for enterprises with heavy RabbitMQ traffic or verbose logging.

7. Better Stack

Known for

Better Stack is known for its modern, developer-friendly observability suite that combines logs, traces, metrics, uptime checks, and incident management into a single platform. It emphasizes a clean user interface and fast setup, making it attractive to engineering teams that don’t want the complexity of older enterprise monitoring tools. With a prebuilt RabbitMQ dashboard and integration guides, Better Stack provides a straightforward path to monitoring RabbitMQ without heavy overhead.

RabbitMQ Monitoring Features

• Prebuilt RabbitMQ dashboards for visualizing queue depth, consumer activity, and message throughput
• Guides for collecting RabbitMQ logs and metrics with agents like Vector
• Alerting options for detecting queue backlogs, consumer failures, and connection issues
• Ability to connect RabbitMQ telemetry with uptime and incident response tools in the same platform

Key Features

• Unified observability with logs, traces, metrics, uptime monitoring, and incidents
• SQL-like query language for fast log search and analytics
• Intuitive dashboards and alerting tailored for developers
• Integrations with popular DevOps tools for on-call and collaboration

Pros

• Easy onboarding with a clean UI
• Includes incident management and uptime checks out-of-the-box
• Prebuilt RabbitMQ monitoring dashboards speed up setup

Cons

• Bundle-based pricing instead of strict per-GB billing
• May require tuning to handle very high RabbitMQ trace/log volumes

Pricing

Logs & Traces

• Included: 3GB/month retained for 3 days
• Extra ingestion: $0.45 per GB
• Retention: $0.025 per GB per week
• Single-tenant & host-your-own bucket: Enterprise options
• Base platform fee: $208/month

Better Stack RabbitMQ Monitoring Pricing at Scale

For a mid-sized company ingesting 10TB/month of RabbitMQ logs and traces, costs scale significantly. Ingestion at $0.45/GB comes to about $4,608/month (10,240 GB × $0.45). If the company chooses to retain 1TB of that data for one week, at $0.025/GB/week, retention adds $25/month (1,000 GB × $0.025). Metrics overhead is modest — assuming 2B data points included, even with an extra 2B samples, the charge would be $10/month (2 × $5). Adding the $208 base fee, the total RabbitMQ monitoring bill is around $4,851/month ($4,608 + $25 + $10 + $208). This does not include optional uptime monitoring expansions, which could add further costs.

Tech Fit

Better Stack is a great fit for SaaS startups and DevOps teams that want RabbitMQ monitoring tightly integrated with uptime checks, logging, and incident response in one tool. It’s especially appealing for teams that prioritize ease of use, clean dashboards, and bundle-style pricing over the complexity of larger enterprise observability platforms.

8. Dynatrace

Known for

Dynatrace is known for its AI-driven observability and automation platform, powered by the Davis AI engine and its Grail data lakehouse. It provides detailed insights into applications, infrastructure, Kubernetes, and messaging systems like RabbitMQ, with an emphasis on automatic discovery and root-cause analysis.

RabbitMQ Monitoring Features

• Extension-based integration that collects metrics from the RabbitMQ Management API
• Prebuilt dashboards covering queue depth, publish/deliver/ack rates, consumer counts, and node availability
• Support for quorum queues, cluster replication health, and failover awareness
• Automatic baselining with Davis AI to detect anomalies in message throughput or consumer activity

Key Features

• Full-stack monitoring across infrastructure, applications, Kubernetes, and messaging systems
• Logs, metrics, and traces unified in Grail for long-term storage and fast querying
• Davis AI for automated anomaly detection and problem resolution
• Advanced dependency mapping for distributed systems

Pros

• Strong AI-powered anomaly detection and root-cause insights
• Transparent rate card with clear per-GB pricing for logs and traces
• Deep integration with Kubernetes and large-scale distributed systems

Cons

• Complex pricing model with multiple units (GiB-hour, GiB-day, GiB-scanned)
• Extensions require additional setup compared to simple agent-based tools

Pricing

• Log ingest: $0.20/GiB
• Trace ingest: $0.20/GiB
• Log and trace retention: $0.0007/GiB-day
• Querying in Grail: $0.0035/GiB scanned

Dynatrace RabbitMQ Monitoring Pricing at Scale

For a mid-sized company ingesting 10TB/month of RabbitMQ telemetry, Dynatrace’s pricing quickly adds up. Log Management & Analytics ingest at $0.20/GB costs about $2,048/month (10,240 GB × $0.20). If the team retains 1TB for 30 days, retention at $0.0007/GB/day adds about $21/month (1,000 GB × $0.0007 × 30 days). For compute, assume 50 hosts running full-stack monitoring at $0.08/hour; this equals $2,880/month (50 × 24 × 30 × $0.08). If instead those hosts used the cheaper infrastructure-only option, it would be $1,440/month (50 × 24 × 30 × $0.04). Adding in both logs and full-stack monitoring, the total RabbitMQ monitoring cost comes to roughly $4,949/month ($2,048 + $21 + $2,880), excluding query scan charges, which are billed separately per GB scanned.

Tech Fit

Dynatrace is a great fit for large enterprises running RabbitMQ in complex, distributed environments that require automated anomaly detection, deep dependency mapping, and AI-driven root-cause analysis. It’s best suited for teams that value advanced intelligence over simple dashboards and are comfortable managing a more complex pricing model.

Conclusion

Monitoring RabbitMQ is essential to keep queues healthy, consumers responsive, and messages flowing reliably across distributed systems. While the native UI offers basic visibility, production workloads demand correlated observability across metrics, traces, and logs to quickly detect and resolve backlogs, consumer stalls, or connection issues.

The tools we’ve explored—ranging from CubeAPM’s RabbitMQ-specific dashboards and flat $0.15/GB pricing to enterprise options like Datadog, New Relic, Dynatrace, and Splunk, as well as flexible platforms like Grafana Cloud, Elastic, SigNoz, and Better Stack—show that no single approach fits every team. Each tool balances integration depth, cost model, and ease of use differently.

For organizations that want predictable costs and deep RabbitMQ visibility, CubeAPM stands out as the most efficient choice. Its direct RabbitMQ integrations, correlation across signals, and transparent pricing make it ideal for teams scaling message-driven systems in 2025.