CubeAPM
CubeAPM CubeAPM

Glowroot Alternatives: Top Competitors in 2025

Glowroot Alternatives: Top Competitors in 2025

Table of Contents

Glowroot is a lightweight, open-source Java APM with deep instrumentation for popular Java frameworks and low runtime overhead. However, its scope is limited to Java, with no native support for other languages or cross-stack observability.

CubeAPM is the best alternative to Glowroot, providing a full-stack, OpenTelemetry-native observability platform that supports multiple languages and services beyond Java.

In this article, we’ll explore the top Glowroot alternatives, comparing their features, deployment models, pricing structures, and scalability, to help you choose the best fit for your observability needs.

Top 7 Glowroot Alternatives

  1. CubeAPM
  2. SigNoz
  3. Grafana
  4. AppSignal
  5. New Relic
  6. Datadog
  7. Dynatrace

Why Look for Glowroot Alternatives?

1. Limited Scope (Java-only, agent-centric)

Glowroot is designed specifically for JVM environments, tracking slow methods, SQL queries, and traces. It cannot monitor applications built in other languages or provide insights into frontend performance.

2. Self-hosted operational responsibility

Glowroot requires teams to deploy, operate, and maintain the monitoring infrastructure themselves, which can add operational effort as environments scale.

Criteria for Suggesting Glowroot Alternatives

1. Multi-Stack Support

Alternatives should be capable of monitoring applications across multiple programming languages, cloud providers, and containerized environments—not just Java.

2. Full-Stack Observability (MELT + RUM + Synthetics)

The ideal tool should cover metrics, events, logs, and traces, while also offering real-user monitoring and synthetic testing capabilities.

3. OpenTelemetry Integration

Native OTel instrumentation ensures flexibility, interoperability, and vendor-neutral observability.

Glowroot Overview

glowroot alternatives

Known For

Glowroot is an open-source, lightweight Java APM designed for quick setup and minimal overhead. It’s best known for capturing JVM-level metrics, transaction traces, slow query detection, and error tracking, making it ideal for Java-centric environments.

Standout Features

  • Lightweight Agent: Deployed via -javaagent with minimal performance impact.
  • Real-Time Tracing & Profiling: Captures method-level execution details and continuous profiling data.
  • Responsive UI: Works seamlessly across desktop and mobile.
  • Optional Central Collector: Enables aggregation from multiple JVMs into a single dashboard.

Key Features

  • JVM metrics and garbage collection stats via MBeans.
  • Slow transaction and error detection with configurable thresholds.
  • SQL and service call aggregation for performance analysis.
  • Historical data rollups for trend tracking.
  • Alerting based on custom conditions.
  • Support for async request workflows.

Pros

  • Extremely low resource footprint
  • Simple and fast deployment
  • Detailed JVM insights without extra licensing costs
  • Mobile-friendly interface
  • Flexible self-hosting options

Cons

  • Java-only monitoring
  • Community-only support, no enterprise SLA

Best For

Teams running Java-based applications who want a cost-free, self-hosted APM for JVM diagnostics and are comfortable operating without broader observability features.

Pricing & Customer Reviews

Glowroot is free under the Apache 2.0 license, with no licensing fees; costs are limited to hosting infrastructure.

Top 7 Glowroot Alternatives

1. CubeAPM

CubeAPM as the best glowroot alternative

Known For

CubeAPM is a modern full-stack observability platform built to replace or extend limited APM setups like Glowroot. It’s designed for speed, simplicity, and cost efficiency, combining metrics, logs, traces, infrastructure monitoring, database monitoring, synthetics, RUM, and error tracking in one platform, with native OpenTelemetry support.

Key Features

  • Application Performance Monitoring: End-to-end visibility into APIs, services, and transaction flows.
  • Distributed Tracing: Context-aware smart sampling to retain the most valuable traces while cutting storage costs.
  • Log Monitoring: Unified log collection and querying for faster troubleshooting.
  • Infrastructure Monitoring: Host, container, and cloud resource health tracking.
  • Synthetic Monitoring: Unlimited checks for uptime and performance from multiple locations.
  • Real User Monitoring (RUM): Measures actual end-user experience in browsers.
  • Error Tracking: Unlimited error capture with detailed diagnostics.

Standout Features

  • Smart Sampling: Retains high-value traces like slow or failed requests at greater efficiency, delivering over 60% cost savings compared to traditional probabilistic sampling.
  • Data Localization Compliance: Stores telemetry inside the customer’s own cloud to reduce egress costs and meet data sovereignty requirements.
  • High Compatibility: Works seamlessly with New Relic, Datadog, Prometheus, Elastic, and other popular agents.

Pros

  • Comprehensive MELT + RUM coverage in a single platform
  • Native OpenTelemetry compatibility
  • Predictable flat-rate or usage-based pricing without hidden fees
  • Faster support via Slack/WhatsApp channels with core developers
  • Flexible self-hosted or SaaS deployment

Cons

  • Not suited for teams looking for off-prem solutions
  • Strictly an observability platform and does not support cloud security management

Best For

Organizations that want to move beyond Java-only monitoring to a unified, multi-stack observability platform, reduce costs through efficient sampling, and maintain data within their own cloud for compliance.

Pricing & Customer Reviews

  • Data Ingestion: $0.15/GB
  • Customer Rating: 4.7/5 based on end-user feedback
  • Users highlight CubeAPM’s affordability, responsive support, and comprehensive feature set. Some note that, as a newer platform, its ecosystem is still growing compared to longer-established solutions.

CubeAPM vs Glowroot

Glowroot is a lightweight, open-source APM focused on Java applications with deep Java framework instrumentation. CubeAPM, in contrast, is a full-stack, OpenTelemetry-native observability platform designed for multi-language and distributed environments.

2. SigNoz

signoz as glowroot alternative

Known For

SigNoz is an open-source, OpenTelemetry-native observability platform that unifies metrics, logs, and traces into one interface. It’s a cost-effective alternative to SaaS APM tools, offering transparency, self-hosting, and full-stack coverage.

Key Features

  • OpenTelemetry-Native: Seamless OTel integration for vendor-neutral instrumentation.
  • Distributed Tracing : View end-to-end requests across microservices.
  • Metrics Monitoring : Capture system and application metrics with alerting.
  • Log Management: Integrated log storage and search.
  • Self-Hosting: Run in your own cloud or on-prem for compliance control.
  • Dashboards & Visualization: Customizable charts for all telemetry types.

Standout Features

  • All-in-One Telemetry: Combines MELT in a single platform.
  • Open Source Control: No vendor lock-in, full access to source code.

Pros

  • Open-source and free to self-host
  • Native OTel support
  • Complete MELT coverage
  • Flexible deployment

Cons

  • Managing ClickHouse memory usage is time-consuming
  • Operational complexity, especially for managing the stacks
  • The UI, while functional, might feel cluttered

Best For

Engineering teams seeking an OTel-first, self-hosted APM with full MELT coverage and no vendor lock-in.

Pricing & Customer Reviews

  • Self-hosted: Free
  • Logs: $0.3/GB ingested
  • Traces: $0.3/GB ingested
  • Metrics: $0.1/mil samples

SigNoz vs Glowroot

SigNoz is an OpenTelemetry-native observability platform that unifies metrics, traces, and logs across distributed systems. Glowroot, in contrast, is a lightweight Java-focused APM designed specifically for monitoring Java applications.

3. Grafana

grafana as a glowroot alternative

Known For

Grafana is an open-source visualization and analytics platform widely used for dashboards, metrics, and alerting. While not a complete APM by itself, it integrates with Prometheus, Loki, Tempo, and other telemetry sources for observability.

Key Features

  • Custom Dashboards: Visualize metrics from multiple data sources.
  • Alerting System: Trigger alerts from any connected data source.
  • Integration Ecosystem: 100+ data source connectors.
  • Templating & Variables: Dynamic dashboard rendering.
  • Annotations: Add context to time-series data.

Standout Features

  • Data Source Flexibility: Works with any MELT-compatible backend.
  • Extensive Plugin Library: Community and enterprise plugins for visualization.

Pros

  • Open-source and free
  • Highly customizable
  • Broad integration capabilities

Cons

  • Steep learning curve
  • Complex setup requirements
  • Overwhelming UI

Best For

Teams wanting flexible, centralized dashboards that aggregate metrics, logs, and traces from different sources.

Pricing & Customer Reviews

  • Grafana OSS: Free
  • Pro plan: $19/month
  • Metrics: $6.50/ 1k series
  • Logs: $0.50/GB ingested
  • Traces: $0.50/GB ingested
  • Customer Rating: 4.5/5
  • Praised for customization and visualization power, with some noting complexity for new users.

Grafana vs Glowroot

Glowroot is a lightweight, open-source APM focused on monitoring Java application performance with low overhead. Grafana, by contrast, provides full-stack observability with intuitive visualization across metrics, logs, and traces, making it better suited for teams that need broad visibility across diverse systems.

4. AppSignal

AppSignal as glowroot alternative

Known For

AppSignal is a SaaS APM focused on developers, offering application monitoring, error tracking, metrics, and alerting for multiple languages.

Key Features

  • Multi-Language Support: Ruby, Elixir, JavaScript, Node.js, and more.
  • Error Tracking: Centralized error reports with context.
  • Performance Monitoring: Track response times, throughput, and slow transactions.
  • Host Metrics: Basic infrastructure telemetry.
  • Custom Dashboards: Visualize application and system metrics.

Standout Features

  • Developer-Friendly UX: Clean interface and easy setup.
  • Custom Metrics API: Track custom application metrics.

Pros

  • Simple onboarding
  • Multi-language coverage
  • Integrated APM + error tracking

Cons

  • Overwhelming UX/UI that hinders usability for beginners
  • High costs, especially for high traffic

Best For

Small to mid-sized dev teams seeking a straightforward APM with error tracking and multi-language support.

Pricing & Customer Reviews

  • Logging is free for the first 1GB/month
  • APM: $25 for 250K requests/month
  • Enterprise SAML SSO ($ 449 per month)
  • Long-term log storage ($ 89 per month)
  • HIPAA Compliance ($ 89 per month)
  • Customer Rating: 4.6/5(G2)
  • Praised for ease of use, but some note lack of enterprise-scale features.

AppSignal vs Glowroot

Glowroot is a lightweight, open-source APM focused on monitoring Java application performance with built-in tracing and JVM insights. AppSignal, by contrast, is a full-stack observability platform that provides unified metrics, traces, and error tracking across multiple languages and frameworks, making it a strong choice for teams that need broad, multi-pillared observability beyond Java performance alone.

5. New Relic

New Relic as glowroot alternative

Known For

New Relic is a leading SaaS observability platform offering MELT coverage, AI-powered analytics, and multi-language APM.

Key Features

  • Full-Stack Observability: Metrics, events, logs, traces in one UI.
  • APM: Code-level insights across multiple languages.
  • Browser Monitoring: RUM for frontend performance.
  • Infrastructure Monitoring: Hosts, containers, and cloud resources.
  • Synthetic Monitoring: Proactive uptime and performance checks.

Standout Features

  • AI Insights: Anomaly detection and root cause analysis.
  • Massive Integration Library: 500+ supported technologies.

Pros

  • Complete observability suite
  • Strong enterprise adoption
  • Advanced analytics

Cons

  • Pricing complexity
  • Higher cost at scale
  • Complex initial setup and configuration

Best For

Enterprises needing a mature, feature-rich observability platform with global support.

Pricing & Customer Reviews

  • Free tier: 100GB/month ingested
  • Pro Plan: $0.40/GB ingested beyond the 100GB/month free limit
  • Pro Plan: $349/month for full platform user
  • Customer Rating: 4.4/5(G2)
  • Praised for breadth of features, with some noting unpredictable costs.

New Relic vs Glowroot

Glowroot is a lightweight, open-source APM focused on monitoring Java application performance with built-in tracing and JVM insights. New Relic, by contrast, is a full-stack observability platform that provides unified metrics, traces, logs, and advanced analytics across multiple languages and environments, making it a strong option for teams that need broad, multi-pillar visibility across distributed systems.

6. Datadog

datadog as glowroot alternative

Known For

Datadog is a cloud-based observability platform covering infrastructure monitoring, APM, logs, RUM, and security monitoring.

Key Features

  • Full-Stack Monitoring: Infrastructure, APM, logs, RUM, synthetics.
  • APM: Distributed tracing and code profiling.
  • Log Management: Centralized log storage and search.
  • Synthetic Monitoring: HTTP and browser tests.
  • Security Monitoring: Threat detection and compliance checks.

Standout Features

  • Unified Platform: Single pane of glass for observability and security.
  • Extensive Integration Library: 500+ integrations.

Pros

  • Broad coverage across MELT and security
  • Scalable cloud deployment
  • Rich integration ecosystem

Cons

  • High cost at scale
  • Complex pricing model
  • Overwhelming UI for new users

Best For

Organizations seeking an all-in-one, SaaS-based observability tool with global reach.

Pricing & Customer Reviews

  • APM (Pro Plan): $35/host/month
  • Infra (Pro Plan): $15/host/month
  • Ingested Logs: $0.10 per ingested or scanned GB per month
  • Customer Rating: 4.4/5(G2)
  • Praised for breadth of integrations, with concerns about high prices as costs scale.

Datadog vs Glowroot

Glowroot is a lightweight, open-source APM focused on monitoring Java application performance with built-in tracing and JVM insights. Datadog, by contrast, is a full-stack observability platform that provides unified metrics, traces, logs, and analytics across multiple languages and environments, making it a strong choice for teams that need broad, multi-pillar visibility across distributed systems.

7. Dynatrace

dynatrace as glowroot alternative

Known For

Dynatrace is an AI-powered observability platform delivering deep application insights, infrastructure monitoring, and business analytics.

Key Features

  • APM: Code-level visibility across multiple languages.
  • AI-Powered Insights: Davis AI for root cause analysis.
  • Infrastructure Monitoring: Cloud, hosts, containers, and network.
  • Digital Experience Monitoring: RUM and synthetics.
  • Business Analytics: Track user journeys and KPIs.

Standout Features

  • OneAgent: Single agent for full-stack data collection.
  • Automatic Topology Mapping: Visual service dependency mapping.

Pros

  • Comprehensive observability in one agent
  • Advanced AI-driven analytics
  • Strong enterprise features

Cons

  • Premium pricing
  • Complex setup for custom instrumentation
  • Steeper learning curve

Best For

Large enterprises seeking AI-enhanced, all-in-one observability with strong automation features.

Pricing & Customer Reviews

  • Infrastructure Monitoring: $29 / mo per host
  • Full-Stack Monitoring: $58 / mo per 8 GiB host
  • Customer Rating: 4.5/5(G2)
  • Praised for automation and depth, with some noting high costs.

Dynatrace vs Glowroot

Glowroot is a lightweight, open-source APM focused on monitoring Java application performance with built-in tracing and JVM insights. Dynatrace, by contrast, is a full-stack observability and AI-driven monitoring platform that provides unified metrics, traces, logs, and automated root-cause analysis across complex, distributed environments, making it a strong choice for teams that need advanced, enterprise-grade visibility beyond Java performance alone.

Conclusion

Glowroot remains a lightweight and capable option for Java-specific performance monitoring, offering quick setup, low overhead, and solid JVM-level insights. However, as modern applications increasingly span multiple languages, architectures, and telemetry needs, its limitations become apparent.

The alternatives explored—CubeAPM, SigNoz, Grafana, AppSignal, New Relic, Datadog, and Dynatrace—offer a range of capabilities to suit different teams, from open-source, self-hosted stacks to enterprise-grade, AI-powered observability suites. For teams seeking the most balanced upgrade from Glowroot, CubeAPM stands out with its full MELT + RUM coverage, smart sampling, multi-language support, cost efficiency, and compliance-friendly deployment, making it a scalable, future-ready choice.

Disclaimer: The information in this article reflects the latest details available at the time of publication and may change as technologies and products evolve.

FAQs

1. Why is CubeAPM the best alternative to Glowroot?

CubeAPM offers full MELT + RUM coverage, smart sampling for cost savings, and multi-language support, going far beyond Glowroot’s JVM-only monitoring. It delivers enterprise-grade observability while keeping costs predictable and transparent.

CubeAPM adds features Glowroot doesn’t have—real user monitoring, synthetics, infrastructure telemetry, integrated logs, native OpenTelemetry support, and compliance-friendly self-hosting—making it a complete solution for modern, distributed applications.

Yes. CubeAPM’s efficient smart sampling and flat, usage-based pricing deliver over 60% cost savings compared to major SaaS APMs, without sacrificing features or performance.

Absolutely. CubeAPM is OpenTelemetry-native, ensuring seamless instrumentation, vendor-neutral flexibility, and future-proof observability pipelines—something Glowroot lacks.

Yes. Small teams benefit from its affordability and simplicity, while enterprises leverage its scalability, compliance features, and advanced telemetry capabilities—all from the same platform.

×