CubeAPM
CubeAPM CubeAPM

Kubernetes Pod Pending State: 5 Common Causes, Easy Fixes & Monitoring with CubeAPM

Kubernetes Pod Pending State: 5 Common Causes, Easy Fixes & Monitoring with CubeAPM

Table of Contents

A Kubernetes Pod Pending state is a common but disruptive issue. It occurs when the Pod has been accepted by the cluster but the scheduler cannot place it on any node. With Kubernetes powering over 66% of production container deployments, even a few stuck Pods can delay deployments, stall rolling updates, and trigger cascading failures across services.

CubeAPM helps teams go beyond reactive troubleshooting by monitoring Pending Pods in real time. With OpenTelemetry-native collectors, it captures scheduling events, resource conditions, and PVC bindings, allowing you to see the root cause before it escalates.

In this guide, we’ll explain what the Pending state means, why it happens, how to fix it step by step, and how CubeAPM makes monitoring and prevention simple.

What is Pod Pending State in Kubernetes?

Kubernetes Pod Pending State

A Pod enters the Pending state when it has been successfully submitted to the Kubernetes API server but cannot be scheduled onto any node. Unlike errors where containers start and then fail, here the containers never even launch because the Pod hasn’t left the scheduling phase.

Pending happens during the scheduling stage. After the Pod object is created, the Kubernetes scheduler evaluates whether it can fit onto an available node. If no node matches the requirements, the Pod remains Pending indefinitely If none of the nodes satisfy those conditions, the Pod stays stuck in Pending until the problem is resolved.

Pending is more than just a waiting state — it can block rolling deployments, delay autoscaling, and prevent dependent services from coming online. In large clusters, a few stuck Pods may create a ripple effect where workloads can’t be updated or scaled properly, leading to outages or degraded performance.

When you investigate a Pending Pod with:

Bash
kubectl describe pod <pod-name>

You’ll often see signals like:

  • 0/X nodes are available: insufficient memory/cpu → cluster resource shortage
  • node(s) didn’t match node selector → scheduling rules too restrictive
  • persistentvolumeclaim is not bound → storage not ready
  • node(s) were unschedulable → taints or node conditions blocking placement

In short, the Pending phase is Kubernetes’ way of saying: “I’ve accepted your Pod, but I can’t run it anywhere yet.”

Why Kubernetes Pod Pending State Happens

1. Insufficient Cluster Resources

When no node has enough CPU or memory to accommodate the Pod’s requests, scheduling fails. This usually happens in resource-constrained clusters or when Pods request more than necessary.
Check with:

Bash
kubectl describe pod <pod-name>

Look for messages like 0/5 nodes are available: insufficient memory.

2. Unschedulable Node Selectors or Affinity Rules

If a Pod requires specific labels, taints, or affinity conditions that no node satisfies, it will stay Pending. This often happens when developers set strict affinity without ensuring matching nodes exist.
Check with:

YAML
kubectl describe pod <pod-name>

Look for node(s) didn’t match node selector.

3. PersistentVolume Claims (PVC) Not Bound

When a Pod references a PVC and no corresponding PersistentVolume is available, it cannot proceed. The Pod remains Pending until storage is provisioned or a matching class is found.
Check with:

Bash
kubectl get pvc

Unbound claims will be stuck in Pending.

4. Missing or Invalid Image Pull Secrets

Sometimes Pending is linked to delayed image pulls, especially when required registry credentials are missing. Although this often transitions into ErrImagePull, it can appear first as Pending.
Check with:

Bash
kubectl describe pod <pod-name>

Look for authentication errors related to the container image.

5. Network or CNI Plugin Issues

If the networking layer is misconfigured or CNI pods are failing, the scheduler may delay Pod assignment. This results in Pending Pods even though resources appear sufficient.

How to Fix Pod Pending State in Kubernetes

1. Add More Cluster Resources

If your cluster doesn’t have enough CPU or memory, Pods will never leave Pending.

Check:

Bash
kubectl describe pod <pod-name>

Look for messages like 0/5 nodes are available: insufficient memory.
Fix: Scale out your node pool or resize existing nodes so the scheduler has room to place the Pod.

Bash
kubectl scale nodepool <pool-name> --replicas=5

2. Adjust Resource Requests and Limits

Sometimes Pods request more than any node can provide, leaving them unschedulable.
Check:

Bash
kubectl get pod <pod-name> -o yaml | grep resources -A5

Look at the requests section for excessive CPU or memory values.

Fix:

Reduce requests in your Pod spec to realistic levels, for example:

Bash
resources:

  requests:

    cpu: "500m"

    memory: "256Mi"

3. Fix Node Selector and Affinity Mismatches

Strict selectors can block scheduling if no node matches.
Check:

Bash
kubectl describe pod <pod-name>

If the event says node(s) didn’t match node selector, your rules are too restrictive.
Fix: Either relax the affinity in the Pod spec or label nodes to match:

Bash
kubectl label nodes <node-name> disktype=ssd

4. Resolve PersistentVolume Issues

Pods referencing unbound PVCs will stay Pending until storage is ready.
Check:

Bash
kubectl get pvc

If the claim shows Pending, it’s not bound to a volume.
Fix: Provision a compatible PV or update the PVC to use an available StorageClass.

5. Validate Image Pull Secrets

If registry credentials are missing, Pods may sit Pending before failing with ErrImagePull.
Check:

Bash
kubectl describe pod <pod-name>

Look for authentication failures under “Events.”

Fix: Create the correct secret and attach it to the Pod:

Bash
kubectl create secret docker-registry regcred \

  --docker-username=user --docker-password=pass

Monitoring Pod Pending State in Kubernetes with CubeAPM

Fixing Pending Pods reactively works once, but preventing them requires monitoring. CubeAPM ingests Kubernetes events, Prometheus/KSM metrics, and pod/node logs through the OpenTelemetry Collector, so you can see why Pods are stuck and act before outages occur.

1. Install the OpenTelemetry Collectors

Add the repo and install both collectors:

Bash
helm repo add open-telemetry https://open-telemetry.github.io/opentelemetry-helm-charts
helm repo update open-telemetry

DaemonSet for node/pod metrics + logs:

Bash
helm install otel-collector-daemonset open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector -f otel-collector-daemonset.yaml

Deployment for cluster-level metrics + events:

Bash
helm install otel-collector-deployment open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector -f otel-collector-deployment.yaml

2. Example Values for Pod Pending Monitoring

Here’s a minimal config that ensures Pending Pods and scheduling events are collected:

YAML
receivers:
  prometheus:
    config:
      scrape_configs:
        - job_name: 'kube-state-metrics'
          static_configs:
            - targets: ['kube-state-metrics.kube-system.svc.cluster.local:8080']

processors:
  batch:

exporters:
  otlp:
    endpoint: cubeapm-otlp.cubeapm.com:4317
    headers:
      authorization: "Bearer <API_KEY>"

service:
  pipelines:
    metrics:
      receivers: [prometheus]
      processors: [batch]
      exporters: [otlp]

This setup scrapes kube_pod_status_phase metrics and pushes them directly into Cub3. 

3. Example Values for Cluster Metrics & Events (Deployment)

This setup pulls cluster-wide events such as scheduling failures, PVC delays, and node taints.

YAML
receivers:
  prometheus:
    config:
      scrape_configs:
        - job_name: 'kube-state-metrics'
          static_configs:
            - targets: ['kube-state-metrics.kube-system.svc.cluster.local:8080']

processors:
  batch:

exporters:
  otlp:
    endpoint: cubeapm-otlp.cubeapm.com:4317
    headers:
      authorization: "Bearer <API_KEY>"

service:
  pipelines:
    metrics:
      receivers: [prometheus]
      processors: [batch]
      exporters: [otlp]

4. Verify Metrics in CubeAPM Dashboards

Once installed, CubeAPM dashboards will show:

  • Number of Pods in Pending state per namespace.
  • Node pressure (CPU/memory) correlated with Pending Pods.
  • PVC binding delays that block Pod scheduling.

Engineers can filter by namespace or workload to isolate the problem.

5. Add Pending Pod Alerts

Catching Pending early is key to avoiding blocked rollouts. Add this alert to your Prometheus rules file:

YAML
- alert: PodPending
  expr: kube_pod_status_phase{phase="Pending"} > 0
  for: 5m
  labels:
    severity: warning
  annotations:
    summary: "Pod stuck in Pending"
    description: "Pod {{ $labels.pod }} in namespace {{ $labels.namespace }} has been Pending for more than 5 minutes."

Reload Prometheus/Alertmanager, and CubeAPM will forward alerts with full context.

Example Alert Rules

1. Alert for Pending Pods

Pending Pods often signal blocked deployments or scaling operations. Detecting them early ensures teams can act before they cause cascading failures.

YAML
- alert: PodPending
  expr: kube_pod_status_phase{phase="Pending"} > 0
  for: 5m
  labels:
    severity: warning
  annotations:
    summary: "Pod stuck in Pending"
    description: "Pod {{ $labels.pod }} in namespace {{ $labels.namespace }} has been Pending for more than 5 minutes."

2. Alert for Insufficient Cluster Resources

One of the most common reasons Pods remain Pending is that nodes don’t have enough CPU

YAML
memory, or disk space. This alert ties Pending directly to cluster capacity problems.
- alert: InsufficientClusterResources
  expr: kube_node_status_condition{condition="OutOfDisk"} == 1
  for: 2m
  labels:
    severity: critical
  annotations:
    summary: "Cluster running out of resources"
    description: "Cluster nodes are out of resources, which may be causing Pods to remain in Pending state."

3. Alert for Unbound PersistentVolumeClaims

If a PVC is not bound, Pods depending on it will remain Pending. This alert helps teams catch storage delays before they block workloads.

YAML
- alert: PVCUnbound
  expr: kube_persistentvolumeclaim_status_phase{phase="Pending"} > 0
  for: 10m
  labels:
    severity: critical
  annotations:
    summary: "Unbound PVC detected"
    description: "PVC {{ $labels.persistentvolumeclaim }} in namespace {{ $labels.namespace }} has been unbound for over 10 minutes, leaving Pods in Pending state."

4. Alert for Scheduling Failures Due to Node Selectors

Sometimes Pods can’t be scheduled because no node matches the required labels or tolerations. This alert highlights when scheduling rules are too restrictive.

YAML
- alert: PodSchedulingFailure
  expr: kube_pod_status_scheduled{condition="false"} > 0
  for: 5m
  labels:
    severity: warning
  annotations:
    summary: "Pod scheduling failure"
    description: "Pod {{ $labels.pod }} in namespace {{ $labels.namespace }} cannot be scheduled due to node selector or affinity mismatches."

Conclusion

The Pod Pending state is one of the most common scheduling issues in Kubernetes. While it might look harmless at first, it can delay deployments, stall autoscaling, and block dependent services from starting. Left unchecked, Pending Pods can snowball into larger outages and wasted resources.

Most Pending problems come down to a few root causes — cluster resource shortages, restrictive scheduling rules, unbound PVCs, or node conditions. With the right checks (kubectl describe pod, reviewing PVCs, and monitoring node health), engineers can fix them quickly and keep workloads running smoothly.

But reactive fixes aren’t enough in production. With CubeAPM, teams gain proactive visibility into scheduling delays, node pressure, and PVC bindings. By monitoring these signals in real time and setting alerts for Pending Pods, you can reduce MTTR, prevent cascading failures, and keep your Kubernetes environment reliable at scale.

FAQs

1. What does Pod Pending mean in Kubernetes?

A Pod in Pending has been accepted by the API server but cannot be scheduled onto a node. This often happens due to resource shortages, PVC delays, or scheduling rules. With CubeAPM, you can quickly identify which of these factors is blocking the Pod by analyzing scheduling metrics and Kubernetes events in one place.

The basic way is to run:

kubectl describe pod <pod-name>

But in larger clusters this gets noisy. CubeAPM makes it easier by correlating Pending events with node resource pressure, PVC states, and taint conditions on a live dashboard so you don’t waste time sifting through logs.

Yes. In rolling updates or autoscaling, Pending Pods can stall new versions from being released. CubeAPM alerts you as soon as Pods stay Pending for too long, helping teams take action before deployments fail.

Technically, a Pod can remain Pending indefinitely until the issue is resolved. CubeAPM prevents this from going unnoticed by generating alerts tied to Pod status metrics, ensuring engineers don’t miss scheduling failures.

CubeAPM gives a complete picture of Pending Pods by combining Kubernetes events, resource metrics, and PVC bindings. It highlights the exact cause, provides real-time dashboards, and integrates alerting so teams can fix scheduling bottlenecks before they affect production workloads.

×