Table of content
ToggleDynatrace is a popular observability platform with 3600+ customers worldwide and over $1.5 billion reported annual recurring revenue (ARR) by Q4 2024. This all-in-one platform offers application performance monitoring (APM), infrastructure monitoring, real user monitoring, and root cause analysis (thanks to its Davis AI Engine).
Dynatrace’s great power comes at a hefty price tag, complex setup, learning curve, and vendor lock-ins. While it supports OpenTelemetry (OTEL), the integration is limited and tightly coupled with its proprietary model, which can constrain flexibility for teams using open standards. Additionally, Dynatrace offers only partial on-premise deployment through its Managed offering, lacking a fully self-hosted option for complete infrastructure control. With the observability space evolving rapidly, DevOps teams and security-conscious organizations are seeking more architecturally flexible, customizable, and cost-efficient solutions to meet growing infrastructure demands. This has prompted many to search for better alternatives to Dynatrace.
CubeAPM is one of the best Dynatrace alternatives that offers full-stack observability (APM, logs, metrics, traces, RUM, and synthetics). You’ll get advanced features, such as smart sampling, real-time alerts, fast agent migration, and OpenTelemetry and Slack support. You can self-host the data in your own environment, which is beneficial for data privacy-focused companies to meet compliance standards.
The best thing is you’ll get everything at a 60-80% lower cost than Dynatrace and without vendor lock-ins. CubeAPM is ideal for teams looking for deep observability and on-prem deployment at a predictable, realistic cost. All of this makes CubeAPM an excellent alternative to Dynatrace.
This article talks about 7 Dynatrace alternatives and compares them based on pricing, key features, pros and cons, and online reviews. You’ll also understand why people are looking for Dynatrace alternatives in detail and how to choose the best one based on your needs.
Top 7 Dynatrace Alternatives
- CubeAPM
- New Relic
- Datadog
- Splunk AppDynamics
- Grafana
- CoraLogix
- Sentry
Why Look for Dynatrace Alternatives?
Dynatrace is undeniably powerful for large enterprises looking for monitoring at scale. But once you peek under the hood (and your monthly bill), many teams start questioning their choices.
Many Dynatrace users think it’s too legacy, resource-hungry, and adversely affects clusters. Here’s what a user has to say about Dynatrace on Reddit:
Let’s talk about some real pain points teams face, the reasons why they are looking for Dynatrace alternatives:
The DDU Cost Complexity
Dynatrace uses the Davis Data Units (DDUs) to price its services. It sounds cool until you realize your custom metrics are eating through your budget. What started as a few custom dashboards can quickly spiral into planned overages, with high-cardinality metrics, verbose logging, and trace-heavy apps.
So, predicting the cost becomes difficult, especially if you’ve extensive monitoring requirements. Their pricing also doesn’t go hand-in-hand with usage patterns as your infrastructure and data volume scale. Smaller organizations with fewer monitoring needs may end up paying more for unused services.
Example: Suppose there’s a mid-size company with 50 hosts, 10 TB/month (10,000 GB) telemetry ingestion, and 20 engineers using full platform access for tracing across payment and inventory services. Let’s calculate the cost:
For a startup with 20 hosts, 4 TB (4,000 GB) monthly data ingestion, and 10 engineers using full access for tracing across payment and inventory services
Dynatrace Cost Estimate (Approximate)
Dynatrace’s pricing is based on multiple dimensions, such as host units, custom metrics, Davis AI, session replay, log storage, etc.
- Infrastructure Monitoring: ~$21–$45/host/month → 50 hosts × ~$33 avg = $1,650/month
Dynatrace’s infrastructure monitoring starts at $0.04/hour per host, translating to ~$28.80/host/month, with average usage estimates around $33/month per host for mid-tier plans.
- Log Management: Extra cost based on ingestion & retention
- APM & Davis AI: additional per-feature costs
- Support, SLO dashboards, synthetic checks: premium tier only
Estimated Range: $2,000–$3,500/month
Dynatrace uses a DDU-based pricing model, which aggregates usage across logs, metrics, traces, and events into dynamic units. This makes actual billing highly variable and harder to forecast.
Cons:
- Difficult to predict the exact cost without a sales consultation
- Costs increase with team size, features, and retention needs
- Host-based licensing penalizes scale
CubeAPM Cost Estimate (Flat-Rate)
CubeAPM pricing is usage-based with no per-user or host licensing:
- 10,000 GB/month ingestion × $0.15/GB = $1,500/month
- Includes APM, logs, infra, traces, RUM and synthetics
- Unlimited users and retention
- No per-feature upsells
Total Cost: $1,500/month
Pros
- Fully predictable and scalable
- Simple pricing regardless of team size or feature usage
Extensive Learning Curve
Dynatrace offers plenty of features and options, which could be useful for extensive teams but may overwhelm them.
At the same time, too many options create chaos for smaller teams with limited technical expertise. Plus, Dynatrace’s advanced customizations and configurations have a steep learning curve. Your team may need training and more time to understand and use certain functionalities. This adds to the complexity and cost.
Oversmart AI
The Davis AI engine is impressive, no doubt. But not every team wants machine learning to find a slow SQL query. Some prefer faster debugging and the simplicity of digging through raw traces and logs themselves, without the abstraction layer or AI guesswork.
Head-Only Sampling Strategy
Dynatrace uses a head-based sampling strategy. It decides whether to retain a trace at the start of a request, but it often drops slow or error traces under load. This limits visibility into critical issues, especially in high-throughput environments.
In contrast, CubeAPM uses a fully automated, context-aware sampling engine. It prioritizes and retains high-value traces, such as errors or latency spikes, reducing data volume by up to 80% while preserving diagnostic depth. This makes it more precise and cost-efficient for modern distributed systems.
Aspect | Dynatrace | CubeAPM |
Sampling Type | Head-based (probabilistic) | Context-aware (tail-based/signal-driven) |
Error/Slow Trace Retention | May be dropped | Prioritized and retained |
Cost Efficiency | Moderate control | High (60–80% reduction possible) |
Impact on RCA | Can miss critical paths | Precise due to focused trace retention |
OTEL with limitations and Partial On-Prem
Dynatrace offers limited OpenTelemetry support by mapping OTEL data into its proprietary backend. This often results in reduced feature depth compared to its native OneAgent. Dynatrace also lacks a true on-prem deployment.
While some components can be hosted privately, core features like Davis AI and Smartscape remain cloud-dependent. This is less suitable for teams with strict data residency or full OTEL-native requirements.
Self-Hosting Not Supported
For industries requiring data localization or compliance (e.g., finance, healthcare, government), the lack of on-prem options is a dealbreaker.
Delayed Customer Support
Dynatrace provides support primarily through ticketing systems, documentation, and enterprise SLAs. Its response times range from hours to days, depending on severity.
In contrast, CubeAPM offers fast, developer-first support via Slack and WhatsApp with direct access to engineers. This helps them resolve issues in minutes, making it more agile and responsive for modern engineering teams.
Criteria for Suggesting Dynatrace Alternatives
When evaluating Dynatrace alternatives, we’ve considered the following criteria, mapped to common decision triggers among engineering and platform teams:
- MELT coverage: Unified support for Metrics, Events, Logs, and Traces (MELT) to ensure full visibility across stack layers.
- Open standards compatibility: Native support for OpenTelemetry, Prometheus, and standard agents to reduce lock-in and enable ecosystem flexibility.
- Smart sampling & retention control: Ability to retain high-signal traces and discard noise, minimizing ingestion/storage costs.
- Ease of migration: Agent compatibility with New Relic, Datadog, or Dynatrace for fast, low-friction transitions.
- Self-hosting / data residency: Ability to run observability on-prem or in-region to comply with data localization regulations.
- Cost predictability: Flat or usage-transparent pricing that avoids per-GB surprises or credit-based complexity (like DDUs).
- Performance & support: Low-latency UI, fast query response, and reliable support via channels like Slack, not just email tickets.
Dynatrace Overview
Known For
Enterprise-grade full-stack observability platform powered by Davis AI, Dynatrace is designed to automate root cause detection, infrastructure monitoring, digital experience analytics, and APM. It excels in large-scale environments where performance intelligence, automation, and application security must converge.
Standout Features
- Davis AI engine: Dynatrace’s most defining capability, Davis AI, continuously analyzes billions of dependencies in real time to automatically surface root causes of performance issues, reducing alert fatigue and manual triage.
- Smartscape topology mapping: Automatically builds real-time, dependency-aware topology maps across services, hosts, containers, and applications—critical for understanding complex distributed environments.
- Full-stack + runtime application security: Unlike traditional APMs, Dynatrace combines observability with real-time runtime application protection (RASP), enabling full DevSecOps workflows from a single pane.
- End-to-end DEM (Digital Experience Monitoring): Combines Real User Monitoring (RUM) and synthetic tests to provide visibility into frontend user experience, web performance, and user behavior analytics.
Key Features
- Unified APM, infrastructure, logs, and user experience monitoring
- Auto-instrumentation across K8s, serverless, VMs, and containers
- Runtime code-level tracing with JVM, .NET, PHP, and Node.js support
- Real-time security alerts for vulnerabilities in production apps
- AI-driven alert correlation and problem detection
- Support for cloud-native environments: AWS, GCP, Azure
- Real User Monitoring (RUM) and built-in synthetic browser checks
Pros
- Comprehensive end-to-end coverage: From infrastructure to frontend, Dynatrace unifies metrics, traces, and logs.
- Highly automated: AI root cause analysis and Smartscape topology reduce manual debugging.
- Strong enterprise readiness: Built-in support for governance, RBAC, SAML, and multi-team observability.
- Security built-in: Integrated app security and runtime vulnerability scanning.
Cons
- Pricing is complex and often unpredictable: Dynatrace uses Davis Data Units (DDUs), which measure ingest + usage; costs can rise steeply with telemetry volume.
- Proprietary architecture: Agent-based instrumentation and closed formats make interoperability with OpenTelemetry ecosystems difficult.
- Heavyweight deployment: Although powerful, Dynatrace’s setup and AI configurations require time and tuning.
- No self-hosted option: Only available as SaaS, limiting data residency control for regulated industries.
- Learning curve for new users: Feature depth and Smartscape’s automation can be overwhelming at first.
Best For
Large-scale enterprises and mature platform teams that prioritize automated diagnostics, integrated application security, and full-stack performance insights across dynamic cloud environments.
Pricing & Customer Reviews
Pricing
Dynatrace charges based on Davis Data Units (DDUs), which represent data ingestion, retention, monitoring activity, and API usage. This model often leads to unexpected overages, especially for high-cardinality workloads or large trace volumes.
Example:
- Full-stack monitoring: $0.08 per hour per 8 GB host
- A single host may consume 10K–50K DDUs/month, depending on trace/log usage.
Customer Sentiment
G2 Rating: 4.5/5 (based on 1,333+ reviews)
- Praised for: automation, AI insights, enterprise readiness
- Criticized for: opaque billing, limited pricing transparency, and vendor lock-in
Top 7 Dynatrace Alternatives
1. CubeAPM
Known For
CubeAPM is an OpenTelemetry-native, cost-efficient observability platform purpose-built for modern engineering teams that need full-stack visibility without the operational burden or pricing complexity of legacy APM tools.
Designed for cloud-native, privacy-conscious, and compliance-driven organizations, CubeAPM delivers high-fidelity observability across applications, infrastructure, and user experience, while reducing telemetry costs by up to 80%. It is the ideal alternative for teams looking to escape vendor lock-in, gain data residency control, and simplify observability at scale.
Standout Features
Smart Sampling Engine
CubeAPM’s context-aware sampling intelligently prioritizes the retention of slow, error-prone, or anomalous traces while discarding low-signal noise. This ensures developers get the critical insights they need without drowning in data volume.
Unlike platforms that rely on static head-based sampling (e.g., Sentry, Datadog), CubeAPM’s smart sampling is tuned for latency, error rates, and contextual relevance, helping teams achieve 60–80% cost savings on ingestion and storage.
Self-Hosted & Privacy-First Deployment
CubeAPM supports cloud, on-premise, or private VPC deployments, giving teams full control over their observability data. This is especially valuable for organizations bound by GDPR, India’s DPDP Act, HIPAA, SOC 2, or internal compliance requirements.
Unlike Dynatrace or New Relic—which offer limited self-hosting in high tiers—CubeAPM enables you to run your entire observability stack wherever your infrastructure lives.
Agent Compatibility & One-Hour Migration
CubeAPM is plug-and-play compatible with agents from New Relic, Datadog, Prometheus, and Elastic. This drastically reduces migration friction, allowing most teams to deploy and begin ingesting data in under one hour without re-instrumenting every service. For fast-moving teams, this translates to minimal downtime and instant time-to-value.
Real-Time Developer Support
Where traditional vendors rely on slow, ticket-based support models, CubeAPM provides direct access to its engineering team via Slack and WhatsApp. This ensures incident triage, troubleshooting, and performance issues are addressed in minutes, not days, making it uniquely appealing to dev-first organizations operating with lean SRE resources.
Key Features
- Full MELT stack coverage: Supports Metrics, Events, Logs, Traces, Synthetics, Real User Monitoring (RUM), and Error Tracking—out-of-the-box and unified.
- Cost transparency & flat pricing: Ingest and transfer cost as low as $0.15/GB and $0.01/GB, respectively, with optional infra cost at $0.02/GBCubeAPM Deck.
- OpenTelemetry & Prometheus native: Built on OpenTelemetry from day one. Supports direct ingestion of OTEL and Prometheus formats.
- Kubernetes & cloud monitoring: Full visibility into Kubernetes clusters, workloads, and infrastructure. Works with AWS and GCP natively.
- Lightweight setup & UX: Minimal onboarding with prebuilt dashboards and no NRQL/DSL requirement. UX optimized for speed and clarity.
- Privacy & data compliance: Ideal for teams needing data stored inside their infrastructure, compliant with localization laws.
- Flexible alerting: Supports error inbox, Slack/webhook notifications, and latency/error-based alerting. No-code setup for alert routing.
Pros
- 60–80% cheaper than incumbents like Dynatrace or Datadog
- Smart sampling reduces data overload without losing insight
- Fast setup; compatible with existing agents
- Self-hosting and on-prem support for compliance-heavy industries
- Real-time developer support (Slack, WhatsApp)
- Clean UI with zero-setup dashboards
Cons
- No built-in security monitoring or CSPM integrations
- Lacks advanced ML-based anomaly detection
- Limited native BI and third-party dashboard integrations
- Smaller community and ecosystem vs legacy tools
Best for
Startups, mid-sized engineering teams, or regulated industries seeking scalable observability with predictable pricing and high compliance.
Pricing & Customer Reviews
- Pricing: depending on ingest volume and infrastructure scale
- Score: 4.7/5
- Common praise: Cost efficiency, fast onboarding, smart sampling
- Common requests: More prebuilt dashboards, deeper third-party integrations
CubeAPM vs Dynatrace
While Dynatrace offers deep AI-powered observability and enterprise-scale Smartscape topology, it comes with complex pricing (based on Davis Data Units), lacks self-hosting, and depends on a proprietary agent ecosystem.
For teams seeking cost control, compliance, and open standards, CubeAPM provides a compelling alternative. With smart sampling, flat-rate pricing, and OpenTelemetry-native architecture, CubeAPM delivers full MELT observability and modern alerting at 60–80% lower cost, without sacrificing performance or signal quality. It’s also deployable on-prem, making it ideal for privacy-first and regulated environments.
2. Datadog
Known For
Comprehensive cloud-native observability suite with powerful integrations, real-time dashboards, and extensive support for infrastructure, logs, security, and APM—all in one SaaS platform.
Standout Features
- Massive integration ecosystem: Datadog integrates with over 900+ tools across cloud platforms, databases, web frameworks, containers, CI/CD pipelines, and more, making it a go-to for heterogeneous environments.
- Live dashboards & notebooks: Real-time visualizations with drag-and-drop dashboards, anomaly detection, and collaborative Notebooks for root cause analysis.
- Unified platform for observability + security: Combines infrastructure metrics, logs, traces, RUM, synthetics.
- CI visibility & deployment tracking: Full DevOps lifecycle support with deployment markers, test coverage, and GitOps analytics.
Key Features
- Full-stack MELT monitoring: Offers Metrics, Events, Logs, and Traces across infrastructure, containers, services, and end-user experiences
- Security & compliance modules: Built-in Cloud Workload Security, CSPM, and Threat Detection for DevSecOps teams
- Real User Monitoring & synthetics: Monitors frontend performance with session replays and API/browser tests.
- Auto instrumentation & language support: Supports Go, Java, Node.js, Python, .NET, PHP, and more with deep auto-instrumentation
- Collaboration & incident management: Integration with Slack, PagerDuty, and Jira; supports monitors, alerts, dashboards, and runbooks.
- Cloud-native integration: Strong AWS, GCP, and Azure coverage including Lambda, EKS, ECS, and serverless performance insights.
- Notebooks & analytics: Collaboration-friendly Notebooks combine logs, traces, and dashboards into a single analysis workflow.
Pros
- Extensive integration ecosystem (900+ integrations)
- Deep coverage of modern infrastructure and DevOps workflows
- Combined observability and security in one product
- Fast, real-time dashboards with anomaly detection
- Scalable for large, multi-cloud environments
Cons
- High and unpredictable cost: Pricing is based on per-host, per-GB ingest, custom metrics, and retention.
- Opaque billing: Teams often hit surprise charges due to log volume or dashboards with many custom metrics
- No self-hosted option: Fully SaaS, which may not work for regulated industries
- Vendor lock-in: Native agents and integrations require tight coupling with Datadog’s ecosystem
- Sampling limitations: Standard probabilistic trace sampling may miss anomalies without manual tuning
Best For
Enterprises and engineering orgs that prioritize a tightly integrated, all-in-one SaaS observability platform with security add-ons, and are comfortable with usage-based pricing.
Pricing & Customer Reviews
Pricing
- Infrastructure: $0 – $34/host/month
- APM: $31-40/host/month (when billed annually), or $36 on-demand
- Logs: $0.10-$0.25/ingested GB
- Security: $15–$40/user/month
- Serverless (Lambda): $10/million invocations
Customer Sentiment
- G2 Rating: 4.4/5 (631 reviews)
- Common praise: integration depth, UI responsiveness, built-in security
- Common complaints: pricing complexity, noisy alerts, data lock-in
Datadog vs Dynatrace
Datadog and Dynatrace both offer enterprise-grade observability, but their strengths diverge. Datadog is integration-first, supporting 600+ tools across the DevOps stack, while Dynatrace emphasizes AI-powered automation with its Davis engine.
However, Datadog’s pricing complexity—with charges across hosts, metrics, and dashboards—often leads to cost unpredictability, as highlighted by Signoz’s pricing breakdown. Dynatrace, though equally premium, offers more native topology mapping and root cause insights, but is locked into a proprietary agent model and lacks a self-hosted option.
3. New Relic
Known For
New Relic is known for flexible full-stack observability with deep dashboards, NRQL query language, and strong support for custom metrics and developer analytics.
Standout Features
- NRQL (New Relic Query Language): A powerful SQL-like query language that enables custom telemetry exploration, alerting, and dashboard creation across metrics, logs, and traces.
- Explorer view & entity-based monitoring: Visualizes dependencies across services, infrastructure, and Kubernetes in real-time—useful for microservice-heavy environments.
- Lookout AI: A machine-learning-powered feature that auto-detects anomalies across your MELT stack without manual configuration.
- Programmable Dashboards: Highly customizable visualizations for SLOs, MTTR, system health, and anomaly trends using prebuilt widgets or code.
Key Features
- Full MELT observability: Unified Metrics, Events, Logs, and Traces within a single UI, with prebuilt views for application, infra, and end-user layers.
- Language & framework instrumentation: Agents for Java, Node.js, Python, Ruby, Go, .NET, and PHP. Supports distributed tracing, profiling, and error tracking.
- OpenTelemetry & Prometheus support: Supports OTEL and Prometheus, though not as natively as OTEL-first platforms like CubeAPM.
- Real user & synthetic monitoring: Track frontend performance and simulate user journeys across global regions.
- Alerting & incident management: Supports anomaly detection, multi-condition alerts, and integrations with Slack, PagerDuty, Jira, and ServiceNow.
- Dashboards & NRQL analytics: Offers real-time and historical visualizations using advanced queries, ideal for data-heavy SRE and DevOps teams.
- Cloud integration: Connects with AWS, Azure, and GCP for host, service, and Kubernetes-level observability.
Pros
- Rich and flexible dashboards with real-time views
- Robust alerting and anomaly detection
- Deep instrumentation support for common languages and infra
- Prebuilt views and guided onboarding for fast ramp-up
- NRQL enables fine-grained telemetry control
Cons
- Complex pricing model: based on ingest volume, custom events, and user seats
- High costs at scale, especially with logs and custom metrics
- Limited data control: SaaS-only; data resides in the New Relic cloud
- Dual agent overhead: can conflict when using OpenTelemetry in parallel
- Learning curve for NRQL and programmable dashboards
Best For
Mid-sized to large organizations that want robust customization, deep dashboards, and are comfortable managing their own query-based observability pipelines.
Pricing & Customer Reviews
Pricing
- Based on data ingest: $0.35/GB beyond free 100 GB
- Data + Data ingest: $0.55/GB beyond free 100 GB
- Core user licenses: $0–$49/user/month
- Full platform user licenses: $0-$418.80/user/month
Customer Sentiment
- G2 Rating: 4.4/5 (512+ reviews)
- Pros: dashboarding, flexibility, broad integrations
- Cons: complex billing, data egress costs, SaaS-only hosting
New Relic vs Dynatrace
New Relic provides powerful telemetry querying via NRQL, customizable dashboards, and good OpenTelemetry compatibility. Dynatrace, by contrast, wins on autonomous monitoring, automatic dependency mapping, and AI-based anomaly detection.
While New Relic’s usage and seat-based pricing can scale up quickly, Dynatrace’s DDU model is even harder to predict. Both are SaaS-only, with limited data control, making them less ideal for privacy-first teams.
4. Grafana
Known For
Grafana is an Open-source observability platform best known for real-time dashboards and metrics visualization—commonly paired with Prometheus and Loki.
Standout Features
- Grafana dashboards: Highly customizable, extensible dashboards for visualizing time-series data from Prometheus, InfluxDB, Elasticsearch, and other sources.
- Loki for logs + Tempo for traces: Grafana Labs’ own tools for logs and traces—integrated into a unified stack alongside Prometheus for metrics.
- Grafana Cloud & OSS flexibility: Users can run Grafana Cloud (SaaS) or self-host open-source versions of Grafana, Prometheus, Tempo, and Loki for full data control.
- Alerting & notification routing: Multi-channel alerting across Slack, email, PagerDuty, Opsgenie, and more, with flexible routing rules and contact points.
Key Features
- Real-time dashboards: Intuitive UI for time-series visualization with full templating, filtering, and annotation support.
- Prometheus + Loki + Tempo integration: Grafana’s default observability stack offers metrics, logs, and traces through open standards and lightweight collectors.
- Self-hosting & open source licensing: Full control over deployment, infrastructure, and data residency with OSS and Enterprise variants.
- Alerting & OnCall: Supports Grafana Alerting (successor to Alertmanager) with built-in escalation policies, silences, and contact points.
- Community & plugin ecosystem: Hundreds of prebuilt dashboards and plugins for MySQL, Kafka, Redis, AWS, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.
- Grafana Cloud: An optional managed observability platform with hosted Prometheus, Loki, Tempo, and integrations.
- Role-Based Access Control (RBAC): Team-based permissions, folders, and dashboards for scalable collaboration.
Pros
- Free open-source option for full-stack observability
- Strong ecosystem around Prometheus, Loki, Tempo, and plugins
- Highly customizable dashboards and alerts
- Offers both SaaS and self-hosted options
- Ideal for infrastructure-focused teams and platform engineers
Cons
- Requires DIY integration for full MELT stack (especially traces and logs)
- No native smart sampling or trace analytics—limited out-of-the-box filtering or correlation
- Scaling requires tuning of Prometheus, Loki, and Tempo backends
- No direct real-user monitoring or security observability
- Support tiered behind paid plans in Grafana Cloud or Enterprise
Best For
Teams with strong observability expertise who want to self-host or customize their stack using open standards and need flexible dashboards over full automation.
Pricing & Customer Reviews
Pricing
- OSS: Free (self-managed)
- Grafana Cloud: Free up to 10K series + paid tiers starting with the Pro plan of $19/month
- Enterprise support and usage-based pricing apply to large deployments
Customer Sentiment
- G2 Rating: 4.5/5 (132+ reviews)
- Praised for: visualization, cost efficiency, plugin ecosystem
- Criticized for: lack of automation, manual scaling/config, alerting UX
Grafana vs Dynatrace
Grafana excels in dashboard customization and open-source flexibility, supporting Prometheus, Loki, and Tempo. It’s ideal for teams who prefer self-hosting and open telemetry standards. Dynatrace offers more out-of-the-box APM features, but requires tight coupling with its proprietary agents. Grafana lacks built-in AI or anomaly detection, making it better for infrastructure observability than automated root cause analysis.
In short, Grafana wins on cost control and openness, Dynatrace on AI and automation.
5. Sentry Overview
Known For
Error monitoring and application performance tracking for developers—best suited for catching bugs and frontend/backend performance issues in real-time.
Standout Features
- Issue grouping & traceability: Automatically groups errors by root cause and tags traces with context like commit SHA, environment, release, and more.
- Frontend + backend visibility: Tracks both frontend (JavaScript, React, Vue) and backend (Python, Node, Java, Go) performance and errors together—ideal for full-stack teams.
- Code owners & Git integration: Connects issues directly to the developers who introduced the code, integrating with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, etc.
- Transaction sampling & alerting: Supports custom performance thresholds, alerts on P95/P99 latency, and trace-based performance bottleneck detection.
Key Features
- Error monitoring & grouping: Captures exceptions, stack traces, and contextual metadata for fast debugging across frontend, backend, and mobile apps.
- Performance monitoring: Traces span across services and routes, letting developers view slow transactions, throughput, and duration patterns.
- Session replay: Captures user sessions and UI context, leading to bugs, especially valuable for frontend debugging.
- Release tracking: Connects releases to errors, crash rates, and regressions with commit tagging and deployment markers.
- Alerting & workflow integration: Supports custom alerts for errors, thresholds, and performance degradation. Integrated with Slack, PagerDuty, and Jira.
- SDKs for most stacks: Supports a wide range of environments, including JavaScript, Python, Java, Go, PHP, Ruby, Flutter, and mobile.
- DevOps and workflow alignment: Maps errors to owners via Git, tracks releases, and closes issues via workflow tools.
Pros
- Excellent for debugging production errors
- Combines performance and error monitoring in one platform
- Deep GitOps integration and ownership attribution
- Lightweight agent SDKs and easy setup
- Great UI for developers and engineering managers
Cons
- Limited infrastructure observability: no native support for metrics/logs from containers, nodes, or clusters
- Not ideal for SRE or infra teams needing MELT stack
- Sampling configuration is less granular than OpenTelemetry-native tools
- Requires combining with tools like Datadog, Prometheus, or CubeAPM for full coverage
- Some performance analytics behind paid tiers
Best For
Frontend/backend engineering teams that want to track bugs, monitor app performance, and connect errors to code ownership, with minimal operational overhead.
Pricing & Customer Reviews
Pricing
- Free up to 5K events/month
- Teams: from $26/month
- Business: usage-based, with tiers for performance monitoring and session replay, starting from $80/month
Customer Sentiment
- G2 Rating: 4.5/5 (116+ reviews)
- Loved for: developer usability, trace linking, debugging speed
- Criticized for: lacking infrastructure depth, high cost for session replay
Sentry vs Dynatrace
Sentry focuses on frontend/backend error tracking, offering Git-based ownership and session replay, features tailored for developers. Dynatrace, on the other hand, targets platform teams and large-scale SRE use cases with deep infrastructure observability.
Sentry lacks full MELT capabilities and is not suited for managing infrastructure, while Dynatrace has limited frontend debugging or release tracking. Teams often pair Sentry with a full-stack tool like Dynatrace, but for pure error monitoring, Sentry is more developer-friendly and cost-effective.
6. Coralogix
Known For
A log-first observability platform designed for DevSecOps teams managing high-volume telemetry. Coralogix focuses on real-time stream processing, modular indexing, and pipeline-level control to reduce ingestion and storage costs.
Standout Features
- Streama™ architecture: Processes telemetry in-stream, enabling alerts and routing before data reaches long-term storage, reducing TCO and improving responsiveness.
- Indexless querying & pipeline routing: Gives teams granular control to stream, archive, or index data based on value, optimizing log workflows and spend.
- Customer-controlled archival: Archived logs are stored in the customer’s own cloud, saving on Coralogix storage costs—but still incurring egress charges and compromising data localization.
Key Features
- Log-centric observability: Unified dashboards for logs, metrics, traces, and lightweight security signals.
- Smart indexing & archive routing: High-value logs are indexed; others are routed to cold storage or dashboards.
- ML-based anomaly detection: Surfaces pattern shifts, outliers, and spikes automatically.
- In-stream alerts: Alerts fire during log ingest—not post-storage—minimizing latency.
- GitOps & CI/CD support: Configurable pipelines and dashboards using version-controlled Git workflows.
- Cloud agnostic + VPC option: Offers hosted and VPC deployments, though the latter adds complexity.
- Compliance & export: Supports audit trails, role-based access, and export to SIEM/Snowflake/S3.
Pros
- Real-time log routing and alerting with minimal lag
- Indexless storage = cost-effective long-term retention
- Logs archived in the customer cloud with zero Coralogix fee
- Deep GitOps integration and pipeline flexibility
- Strong for compliance/SIEM-lite observability
Cons
- Egress charges apply before archival—hidden cost risk
- Fails strict data localization as data first leaves the customer infrastructure
- Metrics/traces are less mature than logs
- UI has a learning curve for non-expert users
- VPC hosting is complex and not turnkey
Best For
Log-heavy teams who need custom pipeline control, real-time alerting, and cost-conscious archival—provided data residency is not a regulatory blocker.
Pricing & Reviews
- Pricing: Usage-based ($0.05–$0.52/ingested GB); archival is free if using own cloud
- G2 Rating: 4.6/5 (299+ reviews)
- Praised for: Pipeline flexibility, GitOps support, and ingest savings
- Criticized for: Egress cost surprises, archival compliance concerns, limited APM maturity
Coralogix vs Dynatrace
Coralogix is a log-first observability platform built for cost efficiency and real-time log routing via its Streama™ architecture. Unlike Dynatrace’s APM-heavy model, Coralogix allows teams to store archived data in their own cloud, reducing storage fees. But this model still incurs egress charges and fails strict data localization standards, since data flows through Coralogix before archival.
Dynatrace offers deeper APM and tracing, but at a higher cost. Coralogix suits log-centric, cost-conscious teams, while Dynatrace fits performance-heavy enterprise apps.
7. Splunk AppDynamics
Known For
An enterprise-grade APM solution, Splunk AppDynamics, focuses on application-centric performance monitoring, business transaction mapping, and deep diagnostics across distributed systems.
Standout Features
- Business transaction monitoring: Maps and monitors transactions across services and tiers, highlighting how backend performance impacts customer experience and business KPIs.
- Cisco Secure Application integration: Built-in application security (RASP) from Cisco integrates directly with APM to flag runtime vulnerabilities and service-level threats.
- Splunk AppDynamics Cloud (formerly APMaaS): Modernized SaaS-based observability with OpenTelemetry support, cloud-native instrumentation, and support for containers and serverless.
- Application dependency flow maps: Auto-discovers service topologies and provides visual maps of application call flows and latency between services.
Key Features
- APM with business context: Correlates backend metrics with business KPIs, such as conversion rates, SLAs, or order failures, ideal for ecommerce or transactional apps.
- Deep code diagnostics: Code-level insights, exception analysis, and JVM/CLR profiling help engineering teams optimize slow or failing services.
- Hybrid environment support: Supports both on-premises and cloud workloads, making it flexible for traditional enterprises moving to hybrid/multi-cloud.
- Real User Monitoring (RUM): Provides browser-based RUM and mobile app monitoring to help connect frontend performance with backend responsiveness.
- Alerting & baseline anomalies: Learns baselines for each service and automatically triggers alerts when performance deviates, reducing false positives.
- Custom dashboards & analytics: Drag-and-drop dashboards combined with flow visualizations to support NOC and executive reporting.
- Cisco ecosystem integration: Benefits from being part of the Cisco stack—offering integration with network, infrastructure, and security tooling.
Pros
- Strong correlation between app metrics and business KPIs
- Deep diagnostics for Java, .NET, PHP, Node.js, and other backends
- Built-in security integration (RASP) via Cisco Secure Application
- Supports hybrid deployments and on-prem workloads
- Good enterprise feature set for large teams and compliance-heavy industries
Cons
- Expensive: per-host and per-module pricing can scale up quickly
- Limited support for modern observability stacks: OpenTelemetry integration is partial and not native
- Legacy-heavy UI/UX compared to newer tools like CubeAPM or Datadog
- Steep learning curve for non-specialists; dashboards require training
- Slower innovation cycle due to enterprise roadmap alignment with Cisco
Best For
Large enterprises with complex, transactional applications that want to align performance with business outcomes and need on-premises or hybrid observability with security features.
Pricing & Customer Reviews
Pricing
- Tiered by APM, infrastructure, RUM, and analytics
- Starts around $6–$50 per host/month (based on custom quotes)
- Higher-tier features and dashboards cost extra per module
Customer Sentiment
- G2 Score: 4.3/5 (375+ reviews)
- Praised for: business transaction mapping, code diagnostics
- Criticized for: price, UI complexity, weak modern observability support
Splunk AppDynamics vs Dynatrace
Splunk AppDynamics specializes in business transaction monitoring and code-level diagnostics, ideal for enterprises needing visibility into revenue-impacting performance. Dynatrace adds AI-driven automation and dependency mapping to that mix, making it stronger for real-time, large-scale environments.
Both tools support hybrid cloud and security observability, but Dynatrace has a more modern architecture. Splunk AppDynamics is often viewed as legacy-heavy and slower to deploy, while Dynatrace brings speed at the cost of simplicity.
Conclusion
The rules have changed in modern APM. Today, it’s not limited to “Can this tool monitor my applications?”. Teams are asking harder questions now.
Is the pricing predictable?
Can I control my data?
Can I migrate hassle-free?
Dynatrace, New Relic, and Datadog are great platforms with enterprise capabilities. But they also come with complexity, steep pricing, vendor lock-ins, among others. This trade-off doesn’t work out for every team, especially smaller teams.
This is why CubeAPM hits differently. It actually offers what modern teams need:
- Smart trace sampling: that keeps the signals while cutting the noise (and cost)
- Full MELT coverage: tracks metrics, events, logs, and traces (MELT) with OpenTelemetry baked in from day one
- On-prem + cloud deployment: host on-premises or in the cloud, the choice is yours, and meet compliance needs
- Flat pricing: transparent and predictable pricing, no surprises
- Real-time developer support: real humans answer your questions in real time
Ready to escape APM bloat?Move toward a cost-efficient observability solution, CubeAPM, that scales with your team.