
Application Performance Monitoring
Fast & Cost-Effective APM with AI-based sampling. Runs On-Prem with no traces data sent out of your cloud.

Application Performance Monitoring
Fast & Cost-Effective APM with AI-based sampling. Runs On-Prem with no traces data sent out of your cloud.
Enter your hosts, data volume, and usage to get an instant monthly estimate — and see how it compares to CubeAPM's flat-rate pricing.
| Line item | Dynatrace | CubeAPM | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total / month | $0 | $0 |
No per-host fees. No data-out charges. Flat per-GB rate with APM, logs, and infrastructure all included — running inside your own cloud account.
Pricing last verified March 2026 from Dynatrace's public rate card. Enterprise contracts may differ. This calculator provides estimates only.
To give feedback or report any discrepancy, reach out to [email protected]
This calculator helps you translate real usage assumptions into estimated Dynatrace costs. By adjusting inputs such as infrastructure scale, telemetry volume, and feature usage, teams can see how pricing evolves across different growth scenarios.
It is especially useful for:
Dynatrace’s pricing model is transparent at the unit level, but complexity increases as environments grow because costs are distributed across multiple independent usage dimensions.
Unlike flat host-based or pure ingestion-based models, Dynatrace pricing is calculated across:
At a small scale, these units are easy to estimate. At enterprise scale, multiple dimensions grow simultaneously.
Here are the reasons why Dynatrace’s pricing becomes complex at scale:
Unlike simple per-host or per-GB models, Dynatrace breaks pricing into separate billable units, each with its own published rate:
Pricing Unit | Billing Metric | List Price |
Full-Stack Monitoring | per memory-GiB-hour | $0.01 |
Infrastructure Monitoring | per host-hour | $0.04 |
Kubernetes Platform Monitoring | per pod-hour | $0.002 |
Log Ingest & Process | per GiB ingested | $0.20 |
Log Retention | per GiB-day | $0.0007 |
Log Query Scan | per GiB scanned | $0.0035 |
RUM (Real User Monitoring) | per session | $0.00225 |
RUM with Session Replay | per session | $0.0045 |
Synthetic Monitoring | per action | $0.0045 |
As organizations scale:
Each of these units can contribute separately to your monthly bill.
Full-Stack vs Infrastructure Monitoring:
Full-Stack monitoring is priced at $0.01 per GiB-hour of memory. This means:
If a team doubles memory allocation for performance reasons, observability cost doubles proportionally for those resources. This can make budgeting more complex in cloud-native environments where infrastructure changes dynamically.
Example: A server with 32 GiB memory running continuously for 30 days:
If you have 50 such hosts:
Infrastructure monitoring alone, at $0.04 per host-hour, is cheaper but not equivalent.
Example:
Full-Stack adds depth (traces, code-level insight, distributed tracing) but multiplies cost when host memory size is large or when many hosts are monitored.
Dynatrace log pricing has three separate charges:
At scale, log volume is usually the fastest-growing telemetry signal. As teams increase:
Costs can shift significantly month to month. Choosing the alternative “retain with included queries” model changes the cost structure again, introducing a different retention multiplier.
Example Calculation
Log Ingestion:
Log Retention:
Log Query Scan:
These costs can vary independently, even if ingest stays the same, heavy querying or longer retention will increase bills.
User experience monitoring costs scale with the number of sessions:
Metric | Price |
RUM sessions | $0.00225 per session |
RUM + Session Replay | $0.0045 per session |
Synthetic checks | $0.0045 per check |
High-growth SaaS platforms or consumer applications can see:
These directly translate into session-based billing increases. Unlike infrastructure monitoring, this cost scales with user adoption, not infrastructure footprint.
Example:
Digital experience costs can rival infrastructure costs in high-traffic environments.
Dynatrace pricing is based on an annual platform subscription commitment:
This ensures no surprise “overage rate hikes,” but it also requires accurate forecasting across multiple billable dimensions. A misestimate of memory, logs, or sessions can deplete your commitment early in the year.
Because many cloud environments are elastic (auto-scaling, burst traffic, ephemeral workloads), usage in one month can differ significantly from the next across:
For example, a traffic spike:
Cost drivers can cascade.
In cloud-native environments, pod counts fluctuate frequently due to autoscaling, deployments, and short-lived workloads. Dynatrace charges for Kubernetes monitoring based on pod-hours, meaning every running pod contributes directly to cost.
Pricing: $0.002 per pod-hour
Example: 500 pods running continuously:
500 × 24 × 30
= 360,000 pod-hours
360,000 × $0.002
= $720/month
If scaling temporarily increases pods to 800 for half the month, the monthly cost rises to:
468,000 pod-hours × $0.002
= $936/month
Even temporary scaling events increase observable cost.
Dynatrace pricing scales across independent metrics: memory-GiB hours, log ingestion, RUM sessions, and pod-hours. As systems grow, these expand simultaneously.
Example environment:
Monthly Cost Breakdown
Estimated baseline: ~$30,260/month
The complexity comes from the fact that each metric scales independently; infrastructure growth, traffic growth, and deployment growth all increase cost along different axes.
Dynatrace pricing is straightforward in structure but demanding in practice. You are essentially paying for usage. Memory hours, host hours, pod hours, log ingestion, retention, and user sessions all contribute separately to your total spend.
If costs feel high, the issue is usage behavior, rarely pricing.
Dynatrace charges you for what that feature consumes. When you increase host memory, add pods, expand traffic, or retain more logs, your bill grows because your system grows. That is predictable.
Before optimizing cost, identify which resource dimension is expanding. Is it:
Each one has a different driver and requires a different solution.
Full-stack monitoring is valuable, but not everything needs deep instrumentation. In mature environments:
The mistake I see most often is defaulting to maximum depth everywhere. That is not observability maturity. That is lack of governance.
Log costs grow quietly. Over time teams add debug statements, duplicate attributes, and long retention periods. No single change is dramatic. The accumulation is. Controlling log cost means:
Cloud-native systems scale up and down constantly. When pods double during peak hours, monitoring usage doubles as well. That is how usage-based pricing works.
The optimization lever is not reducing visibility. It is validating scaling policies and avoiding over-provisioned memory or unnecessary burst capacity. Monitoring should scale with real demand, not configuration drift.
Dynatrace operates on an annual commitment model. That commitment should reflect realistic expectations.
If your traffic is growing 30% per year, your observability footprint likely is too. Forecast memory growth, log growth, and session growth before committing.
Underestimating leads to budget pressure later. Overestimating locks in unnecessary spend. Treat commitment planning as part of capacity planning.
Optimization is not a quarterly panic exercise. Look at:
When teams look at usage consistently, cost remains predictable. When they ignore it, it creeps.
Dynatrace pricing mirrors your system. If your architecture is disciplined and intentional, your costs will be too. If monitoring expands without ownership, spend will follow. And that’s an observability governance problem.
CubeAPM is built for teams that need predictable observability costs as systems scale. CubeAPM simplifies pricing around data volume and gives teams direct control over how telemetry is collected, sampled, and retained. It doesn’t not users based on the number of seats, features, or longer retention periods.
The pricing ($0.15/GB) is tied directly to the amount of telemetry you ingest, without hidden multipliers, bundled feature units, or per-user licensing.
CubeAPM prioritizes high-signal telemetry such as errors, high-latency requests, and anomalies while aggressively sampling repetitive, low-value traffic to optimize cost without losing diagnostic depth.
Teams decide what data to keep, how long to retain it, and where it is stored, instead of relying on fixed SaaS tiers or opaque limits.
Observability data stays within your infrastructure or cloud account, avoiding vendor-imposed throttling and enabling more predictable cost behavior during traffic spikes or incidents.
By combining controlled ingestion with targeted sampling, CubeAPM helps teams forecast observability more accurately as workloads, traffic, and telemetry volumes grow.
*All pricing comparisons are calculated using standardized Small/Medium/Large team profiles defined in our internal benchmarking sheet, based on fixed log, metrics, trace, and retention assumptions. Actual pricing may vary by usage, region, and plan structure. Please confirm current pricing with each vendor.
| *Approx. cost for teams (size) | Dynatrace | CubeAPM |
|---|---|---|
| Small (~40) | $7,740 | $2,080 |
| Mid-Sized (~125) | $21,850 | $7,200 |
| Large (~250) | $46,000 | $15,200 |
Check out Dynatrace alternatives based on pricing, features, deployment, and more.
